DM405 - Documentary Film
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Hell House
Not a fan of this one. It's no fault of the filmmaker's. He did a pretty good job actually. Just didn't dig having to sit through the subject matter. Don't get me wrong, I understand the need to record dumb people doing dumb stuff. Serves as a warning to everyone else that this is the type of stuff that happens when your community allows paranoid nonsense to pollute its religion and the education system isn't strong enough to make up for the evaporating genetic pool.
I didn't care at all about the Hell House. When I did find myself caring about was the father that was trying to take care of his family. I mean, here the guy is trying to just get through breakfast and suddenly he's got a kid going into seizure. That's where the heart of the story was, and I believe that the director picked up on this.
I also responded to the character in charge of the rave portion of the Hell House. He was weird, but he was also the only one there that was portraying the truth. He even criticized the "script" for how dumb and unbelievable it was.
But nope, not interested. Think I'm just going to have to go to hell. It's alright though, they apparently have Goosebumps there, and I love me some Goosebumps.
Spinal Tap
You'd think it'd be easier for me to write about this film. It's steadily in the canon of every dorky guy in America. Yet still, what's there to be said that hasn't already been said?
Even though this documentary is fake there isn't much fake about what it portrays. This is the rock scene of that, and maybe even this, era. The filmmakers are holding up a mirror for us to see just how things actually were. The film is sexist in that it depicts the actions of sexist men who operate in a sexist setting. Without them showing this world truthfully it wouldn't be very funny at all. This in turn may cause some alienation with some viewers who don't get, or don't like, the humor. There may also be a disconnect due to the fact that these guys are generally unlikable. Takes some time to stick it out and find their humanity through the puffed up hair and spandex. Even then, it may be too little too late.
Overall this film has held up incredibly well. It's quotable as the day is long. Plenty of rockers still swear that it's more like the actual stage experience then most people realize. I like it. I can't say it's on my list of all time favorites, but it is a part of my collective geekdom.
Citizenfour
Well, hello there government type peoples. Just a heads up, I'm reviewing a film. That is all. You may return to your regular governmental business which I'm sure includes nothing illegal.
On a technical level Citizenfour really impressed me at first. The director really seems to have the same sensibilities as David Fincher, even using a NIN score. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that if Fincher made a documentary it'd look and feel quite a lot like this. I also found it interesting how she could connect these seemingly unrelated clips and make them feel like chapters in the same story. But the momentum that she built at the beginning was quickly lost and the film started to feel like exactly what it was...watching long segments of C-Span. It wasn't until Snowden showed up that the film got interesting again.
Snowden, on the surface, is an interesting and likable guy. He's intelligent and, if you've ever met people like this before you know what I'm talking about, very much an I.T. guy. There's a certain kind of humor and disposition that comes along with that.
Okay, let's cut through the chuffa. Did Snowden do the right thing? Or, at least, did he go about what he did the right way? The simple answer is yes. He couldn't trust the system. I mean, what's the point of reporting that a system is corrupt right back to that exact same system? He took steps necessary to be sure that the information was being transferred and disseminated in an unbiased way. No, it wasn't an ideal situation, but it was the best he could do given the circumstances he was under. I believe him when he says that it's not about him. He wasn't seeking publicity, but he genuinely acted on moral grounds.
Sunday, October 4, 2015
Marwencol
This was a very surprising and interesting documentary. But first off, let me get this out of the
way. The technical aspect of the
filmmaking, the choices and resources of the filmmaker, weren’t that
great. A lot of that has to do with
limitations, a hurdle that we all have to deal with. Obviously he didn’t have a lot of money to
work with. So it wasn’t the prettiest of
documentaries. Okay, fine, who cares,
moving on. But there were a few obvious
reenactments, specifically when he was checking the mail, which took me out of
the movie. Just shoot what’s happening
when it’s happening and let us deal with the rest. Both the sound and editing could also use
some work.
So overall it’s the work of a filmmaker still building his
skills while dealing with limitations.
With that said he showed great insight when it came to picking his
subject. Hogancamp easily carries us
through the movie despite the flaws in both the filmmaking and in himself.
What I see when I look at Hogancamp is a man reduced. I don’t necessarily mean that in the
diminishing kind of way, though that’s part of it. I mean it in the sense of how you would
reduce soup. Leave it on the stove; let
it boil down, until you’re left with core of what you were cooking with. Any access baggage he picked up in his life
was suddenly gone. Every experience,
every emotion, was brand new to him. He
ended up falling in love his neighbor, but by his own admission he had no idea
what that feeling was or meant. He had
to learn to process it like a child would have to. And he had to learn the appropriate
boundaries for it like a child would have to.
Only difference is, when it’s a child it’s cute. When it’s a middle-aged man it’s scary. And it’s not that he would be dangerous in
any sort of way, but he had the potential to be. That’s why it was scary.
Speaking of scary, let’s address the sexual fantasies that
are part of his little town. Here’s the
thing, he is, again, experiencing life like a child. Not with the mentality of a child, as he’s got
the intelligence of a grown man, but in the sense of feeling everything as
though it’s brand new. Being a grown
man, with a grown man’s intelligence, he’s going to have desires. As I said before, he’s not carrying the
baggage of his past life anymore. So
experience isn’t going to color his desires or how he presents them in any
way. That makes it a very base and crude
fantasy. What’s good? One woman.
What’s better? More than one woman. What’s best?
An entire town of women. And,
yeah, for sure some control issues mixed in there, but if you think you’re
above all that (speaking to both male and female here) think again. Sexuality is close to the surface no matter
how pure you try to present yourself.
You too can be “reduced” in this sense and I think you’d be amazed how
easily you could reach the same base place as Hogancamp has – no brain damage
required! Hogancamp doesn’t have the
same restraint or shame that everyone has.
And you know what, screw it, let your freak flag fly Hogancamp! To hell with shame, it’s not like everyone
else in the world isn’t a secret and/or repressed pervert. The thing about fantasies is there’re not
real. Swimming in vault of gold coins
like Scrooge McDuck is a fantasy I know many people have and that will never happen
- both for financial and general physics reasons. Just like most of Hogancamp’s fantasy will
never happen, but if that’s his fantasy then he should go ahead and own it the
way he seems to own everything about himself.
That’s another thing I’ve got to address. Hogancamp owns just about every part of who
he is now. And why wouldn’t he, he had
to rebuild everything about himself.
Think about it, it’s almost like he’s his own art project. And those parts that didn’t disappear when he
got his head smashed, why would he try to hide those parts? Those were the only crayons in the box left
to color with. He said it himself, “I
have to be true to myself.” I respect
his ability to do that. I mean, can you
think of anyone who could or would present themselves to the world the way he
does? Is there one person in your life
that says here’s my past, here’s my present, here’s my sexuality, here are my
vices, and here is my damage? The only
thing he seems hesitant to reveal is that he cross-dresses. With good reason too, since last time he did
that he was almost beaten to death.
Though I do find it interesting that after he lost everything, after he
was reduced down to the basics of a human mind, he still held onto the
cross-dressing. He lost everything else,
including his drinking, but not that. I
personally will never understand why people get so freaked out by someone who
likes to wear women’s clothing. Why do
you care? It’s just cloth. Does the way it’s cut and formed really
matter that much? I felt pretty good for
the guy when he finally built up the nerve to rock the high heels at the art
gallery. I don’t know why he found those
shoes so comfortable, I can’t imagine they actually are, but if I did there wouldn’t
be anything to stop me from wearing them.
I’d be catwalking my way to Becker Hall each day letting everybody else
just deal with it.
Well, enough about the guy.
Let’s talk about his therapy. His
pictures were amazing. He managed to
pose these scenes that seemed so naturalistic.
If you were to blur some of them it’d be very hard to tell they were
dolls. The art gallery guy really nailed
it; there was no irony in his work. The
guy loves his dolls like people, quite literally. I suppose he does not really love the dolls
in as much as he loves the characters he’s created in his head. I can only imagine that if I could do that,
if I could allow myself to go there, I could write a pretty powerful
movie. It does seem very Lars and the
Real Girl. (Man, nobody tell this guy
about those dolls. 0.o) But he’s getting
something out of this. Whatever it is
that his brain needs to heal, he’s found it.
I think the documentary ended on the perfect note. It was oddly brilliant that his character in
the doll world was starting the same therapy he did. I’d like to imagine that there’s now a story
within the story. I hope he’s keeping
track of the little dolls lives the way he did the bigger dolls.
Burden of Dreams
I find this movie to be oddly relatable. True, I’ve never been to the rainforest. I’ve never bartered with native tribes in
order to capture more realism. And I’ve
never worked someplace where drinking the water would result in a hospital
visit. Still, it was very relatable.
I once heard that the natural state of a movie is “unmade”
and that the movie will do everything it can do fall back into its natural
state. Now let’s add to that all the
complications of filming in the jungle.
Yep, Werner done bit off more than he can chew. In a way I respect his undying dedication to
the vision of his film. Without a level
of that nothing would get done. But when
you reach a certain point there’s no respectability or nobility in bullheaded
like that. At a certain point, that
point probably being when people are getting hurt, you’re just an idiot for not
coming up with an easier solution.
As far as the filmmaking of the documentary itself goes I
did notice some odd choices.
Specifically I’m referring to the cut away shots that really didn’t seem
to match the context of the scenes that were happening. Like, why the hell did we have to stare at a
chicken’s butt for so long? Did the
filmmaker just have a thing for chickens?
Oh wait, it was Gonzo. Yep,
everything makes sense now. Well, apart
from my muppet theory I did reason out a few excuses for the odd choices.
1. Something went wrong with the film. It happens.
Maybe the roll got flashed by daylight.
So they have the sound, but not the footage. So they just throw on whatever B-roll they
shot during that time. May not match the
story, but it’s better than a black screen.
2. They missed the shot.
Again, it happens. They had one
camera that couldn’t be everywhere at once.
So again, throw on whatever you got.
But the way it sometimes cut away during a scene that got me reasoning
about the third option.
3. The scene being shot could potentially have been used as
Exhibit A. Plenty of times in this film
it feels like the law is being broken. There’s
a good chance that the filmmakers decided to protect their subject and not
include incriminating incidents.
This brings me to Werner’s rant. I was expecting more. It had been built up so much that I figured
he straight up lost it. Really he was very
calm. He had been push too far, but he
was very calm. Don’t get me wrong
though, the words he uses I can see coming out of the mouth of any living
filmmaker. I know I’ve been to that
point. I’ve thought things very similar
to his rant at the end of a few particularly hard shoots.
So overall, while I can relate to how he felt, I can’t see
myself ever going through that much trouble for a film. I especially can’t see myself disregarding
the wellbeing of people for a film.
Especially when it’s a film like that, a film that very few people are
going to see to start with.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






